“The achievements of an
organization are the results of the combined effort of each
individual.” ---Vince Lombardi
Magnets are
fascinating things. Every time we see a magnet we are tempted to plat
with it. It was therefore a pleasant surprise to see Prof.Mandi
walking into class with a chunk of magnet and ask us, “Why does a
magnet attract?”. After many botched attempts by us at giving a
good answer, one person in the class was finally able to say the
right ward – Alignment.
A Magnet has its
power because it can align innate magnetic forces in metallic atoms.
So, magnets (or Physics for that matter) align natural forces . A
Manager aligns human forces to get work done. In effect an
organization is a force that is aligned. The bigger or better an
organization, the more perfectly it is aligned.
Managers align
people and power. They align tasks and objective. They synchronize
both time and space. Management is Music, not noise. It is like the
conductor of grand orchestra, where each instrument contributes to
harmonious music. So here we come to a very important management
lesson – Management by Objective.
Management
by objectives (MBO) is
a process of defining objectives within an organization so that
management and employees agree to the objectives and understand what
they need to do in the organization in order to achieve them. The
term "management by objectives" was popularized by Peter
Drucker in his 1954 book The
Practice of Management.
The essence of MBO is participative
goal setting, choosing course of actions and decision making. An
important part of the MBO is the measurement and the comparison of
the employee’s actual performance with the standards set. Ideally,
when employees themselves have been involved with the goal setting
and choosing the course of action to be followed by them, they are
more likely to fulfil their responsibilities.
For greater clarity on the topic we
compared two different styles of management we had previously studied
in class – the blindfolded tower building and the three monk
collaborative water collection. The major lessons we drew could be
summarised in the table shown below.
|
Blind Tower Building
|
Three Monk Collaboration
|
1.
|
Hierarchical set-up
|
No Hierarchy
|
2.
|
Control with Top Management
|
Consensus among all
|
3.
|
Management Present
|
Management absent and replaced by autonomous
management/ maintenance
|
4.
|
Control Mechanism
|
Consensus Mechanism
|
5.
|
Loading is High and Low
|
Loading is more or less equal
|
We ended our
discussion by comparing two Indian Sporting giants and understanding
why they were unable to cooperate and work. We concluded that the
main reason was a skill set mismatch. Multiple skills COULD come as a
disadvantage as the ability to exercise choice comes into the
picture. Management should figure out which all skills to hone & nurture and which all to get rid of or discourage.
The most important
take away in today's class is – without any doubt – the concept
of MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVE.
No comments:
Post a Comment